Usually after the separation the spouse does not have custody of the child "forget" to be a parent and to be the bearer of moral and financial obligations that the easing of the marriage through separation does not cancel. More and more mothers often forgotten by their former spouses are forced to bear the burden of growth and education of children without a little help from the fathers, sometimes for selfish reasons to believe and sometimes hitting his wife using the neglect of children, and then may change his mind for lost time and send a piercing cry of help from Maria de Filippi get to ask for forgiveness in front of millions of Italians to "You've Got Mail." Recently, the Court of Modena
considered an interesting case and on September 12, 2006 was pronounced by an order worthy of note regarding payment of subsistence allowance to children.
The judge has acknowledged the child's right to compensation for damages (compensation, moral and existential) for defaulting and selfless behavior of its parent, also placing the attachment on the assets of the latter up to an amount considered adequate .
V’è da dire che nel caso concreto parte ricorrente ha provato nel corso di una fase istruttoria corposa e complessa l’effettiva incidenza negativa del comportamento genitoriale sulla proprio sviluppo psico-fisico.
Tale ordinanza si impone per la sua forza innovativa e, pur non costituendo precedente, costituisce valido monito per tutti coloro che “dimenticano” dopo la separazione dal coniuge i propri doveri di genitore nei confronti dei figli anche se va detto, per onestà di verità, che la prova richiesta in sede giudiziale deve essere estremamente precisa e rigorosa, senza la quale non è certamente pensabile un meccanismo di automatismo in ordine a tale tipologia di danno.
Si riporta qui di seguito la massima Ordinance:
"It recognized the right to compensation - compensation, moral and existential - of the child as a result of the conduct of a parent who refuses to pay the same means of livelihood, resulting in" injury in itself "of fundamental the inherent rights of the person as a child and the child. Especially for the existential damage (namely the values \u200b\u200bof the individual lesion, constitutionally guaranteed, which is expressed in terms of social relations and worldly) it must be considered related to consciousness, subjective and social repercussions of not being wanted and never been treated as a child.
considered an interesting case and on September 12, 2006 was pronounced by an order worthy of note regarding payment of subsistence allowance to children.
The judge has acknowledged the child's right to compensation for damages (compensation, moral and existential) for defaulting and selfless behavior of its parent, also placing the attachment on the assets of the latter up to an amount considered adequate .
V’è da dire che nel caso concreto parte ricorrente ha provato nel corso di una fase istruttoria corposa e complessa l’effettiva incidenza negativa del comportamento genitoriale sulla proprio sviluppo psico-fisico.
Tale ordinanza si impone per la sua forza innovativa e, pur non costituendo precedente, costituisce valido monito per tutti coloro che “dimenticano” dopo la separazione dal coniuge i propri doveri di genitore nei confronti dei figli anche se va detto, per onestà di verità, che la prova richiesta in sede giudiziale deve essere estremamente precisa e rigorosa, senza la quale non è certamente pensabile un meccanismo di automatismo in ordine a tale tipologia di danno.
Si riporta qui di seguito la massima Ordinance:
"It recognized the right to compensation - compensation, moral and existential - of the child as a result of the conduct of a parent who refuses to pay the same means of livelihood, resulting in" injury in itself "of fundamental the inherent rights of the person as a child and the child. Especially for the existential damage (namely the values \u200b\u200bof the individual lesion, constitutionally guaranteed, which is expressed in terms of social relations and worldly) it must be considered related to consciousness, subjective and social repercussions of not being wanted and never been treated as a child.
Finally, if there is a danger that the time lag is likely to pronounce on the merits makes it harder and more costly to the satisfaction of that claim (in this case, the danger in delay was established by the ease of volatilization of the debtor's assets consist of liquid capital and shares of company) to caution the actual satisfaction of that claim for damages for the child may be ready to make the attachment, pursuant to art. 671 cpc, property of the defaulting parent to the extent of an amount considered adequate (in this case € 1,350,000.00). "
0 comments:
Post a Comment